{"id":3602,"date":"2015-12-22T08:45:46","date_gmt":"2015-12-22T08:45:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cedos.org.ua\/researches\/ohliad-polityky-shchodo-vnutrishno-peremishchenykh-osib-v-ukraini-veresen-lystopad-2015-2\/"},"modified":"2015-12-22T08:45:46","modified_gmt":"2015-12-22T08:45:46","slug":"ohliad-polityky-shchodo-vnutrishno-peremishchenykh-osib-v-ukraini-veresen-lystopad-2015","status":"publish","type":"researches","link":"https:\/\/cedos.org.ua\/en\/researches\/ohliad-polityky-shchodo-vnutrishno-peremishchenykh-osib-v-ukraini-veresen-lystopad-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"IDPs in Ukraine in September-November 2015. Policy review"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The adoption of the Law # 2166 was probably the most important and long-awaited action. 9 months have passed since its presentation, which means human rights advocacy is weak, and lthe issue was given low priority by the authorities. However, the President had vetoed proposals and provided some changes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":3603,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","topic":[16],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cedos.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/researches\/3602"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cedos.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/researches"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cedos.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/researches"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cedos.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3603"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cedos.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cedos.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?post=3602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}